Good Morning!
Going off the scoreboard this morning for a little chat about one of my other passions: movies. I recently saw Eli Roth's
Hostel. Somewhat interesting, I guess, but more useful to me as an object lesson than an entertainment experience. I was more fascinated by what it shows me than the show.
The comparison's between
Hostel, a gruesome (ostensibly) flick about death and dismemberment, and the
Saw films, gruesome (occasionally) flicks about death and dismemberment. So, what makes them different? Oddly enough, very little - but the little things make all the difference.
Without breaking it down plot point by plot point,
Hostel follows a couple of Americans and a fellow from Iceland as they backpack through Europe. They pursue common debaucheries: mainly drugs, loose women and general boorish behavior. Ultimately, these pursuits lead them to abduction and (pretty pedestrian) tortures. One of our heroes (such that he is) pays a painful personal price to survive. Similarly,
Saw and
Saw II both follow people who are abducted, each challenged to face his or her own sinful behavior and face painful personal prices to survive. And both flicks have more amputations than the average Merchant Ivory production.
And like many horror stories (including those made long before the advent of movies and rubber, bloody severed hands), they are each morality plays. In
Hostel, we learn that if all you pay attention to is gettin' high and gettin' honeys when abroad, the unwary traveler may part with more than his wallet.
Saw preaches something similar: basically, that not making the most of the life you are given makes you unworthy to live it. The difference, and it was key in my impression of both films, is that the philosophy of
Saw is held by it's antagonist, making it a real driving force in both the story and the "what would you do?" element that makes watching many thrillers engaging. In
Hostel, the film's philosophy isn't apparently held by anyone, even the people behind the institution of terror that hosts the dastardly deeds we see, who's base motivations were ultimately anticlimactic to say the least.
Instead of the tension created when we're in that grungy bathroom with the characters in
Saw or the house in
Saw II, where the audience is racing the people on screen to figure out what to do next, I found myself just waiting at
Hostel. What's gonna happen now? Where did that guy go? How's he gonna get out of that? Oh, it's pretty convenient that that happened. I wonder if he's gonna go bac- oh yeah, he is. 'Cause the girl drowned in the pool or something. I felt like I was being dragged along by the story instead of being propelled by it. In fact, this movie made me appreciate the
Saw films even more.
Essentially, it looks like Eli Roth is more into creating the incredibly dark comedy (yes, this is more buddy-comedy-gone-bad than horror film) than real scary movies. And he did a much better job of it with the gross-and-engrossing
Cabin Fever. Go buy that on DVD with the cash you were gonna spend on seeing
Hostel. You'll thank me for it (if you aren't laughing through vomit ... ah, see it anyway).